Page Not Found
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
A list of all the posts and pages found on the site. For you robots out there is an XML version available for digesting as well.
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
About me
This is a page not in th emain menu
Published:
This post will show up by default. To disable scheduling of future posts, edit config.yml
and set future: false
.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Short description of portfolio item number 1
Short description of portfolio item number 2
arXiv:2202.13544, 2022
Given the richness of observational data and usefulness of experimental data, researchers hope to develop credible method to combine the strength of the two. In this paper, we consider a setting where the observational data contain the outcome of interest as well as a surrogate outcome while the experimental data contain only the surrogate outcome. We propose a simple estimator to estimate the average treatment effect of interest using both the observational data and the experimental data.
Dissertation for PhD in Statistics, 2023
This dissertation offers new methodologies and theoretical results to address key issues in causal inference with interference. Specifically, we develop inferential results for causal effect estimators in panel experiments under interference, introduce novel estimation methods for causal effects with network experiments and tackle the problem of detecting interference in online controlled experiments with increasing allocation.
KDD Workshop on Causal Inference and Machine Learning in Practice, 2023
In contrast to several recent papers proposing methods to select one of these competing models, we propose an algorithm for aggregating the estimates from a diverse library of models. We compare ensembling to model selection on 43 benchmark datasets, and find that ensembling wins almost every time. Theoretically, we prove that our ensemble model is (asymptotically) at least as accurate as the best model under consideration, even if the number of candidate models is allowed to grow with the sample size.
ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2023
In this work, we introduce a widely applicable procedure to test for interference in A/B testing with increasing allocation. Our procedure can be implemented on top of an existing A/B testing platform with a separate flow and does not require a priori a specific interference mechanism.
Journal of Causal Inference, 2023
In this work, we introduce a sequential procedure to generate and select graph- and treatment-based covariates for GATE estimation under regression adjustment. To tackle inferential complications caused by our feature generation and selection process, we introduce a way to construct confidence intervals based on a block bootstrap.
Journal of Econometrics, 2024
The phenomenon of population interference, where a treatment assigned to one experimental unit affects another experimental unit’s outcome, has received considerable attention in standard randomized experiments. The complications produced by population interference in this setting are now readily recognized, and partial remedies are well known. Less understood is the impact of population interference in panel experiments where treatment is sequentially randomized in the population, and the outcomes are observed at each time step. This paper proposes a general framework for studying population interference in panel experiments and presents new finite population estimation and inference results. Our findings suggest that, under mild assumptions, the addition of a temporal dimension to an experiment alleviates some of the challenges of population interference for certain estimands. In contrast, we show that the presence of carryover effects — that is, when past treatments may affect future outcomes — exacerbates the problem. Our results are illustrated through both an empirical analysis and an extensive simulation study.
Published:
Master/PhD course, Stanford University, Department of Management Science and Engineering </p>
</article> </div>Undergraduate course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>Undergraduate/master course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>Undergraduate course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>Master/PhD course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>PhD course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>PhD course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>PhD course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>Undergraduate course, Stanford University, Department of Statistics </p>
</article> </div>